研究了 OpenEvidence 120 亿估值后,我发现 AI 赢家都在做同一件事

研究了OpenEvidence 120亿估值后,我发现AI赢家都在做同一件事 Mans International

从潜龙到亢龙,一套写给创始人的 AI 穿越心法

研究了 OpenEvidence 120 亿估值后,我发现 AI 赢家都在做同一件事

从潜龙到亢龙,一套穿越指数变革的心智地图

2026年,AI Agent 的进化速度让无数创始人夜不能寐。

有人担心行业被重写,有人焦虑自己的技术、资金和团队都拼不过巨头。每天醒来,新的模型、新的产品、新的融资消息扑面而来,仿佛稍微慢一步,就会被时代抛下。

但真正危险的,也许并非AI太强,而是我们在恐惧中失去了判断力。

《易经》首卦「乾」,以龙的进阶轨迹,写尽了从蛰伏到巅峰的完整成长法则。结合《吾辈如神》(We Are As Gods)中的五大心智,我们得以构建一套在AI时代穿越周期的心智地图。

一、潜龙勿用——好奇心心智 (The Creative Mindset)

“潜龙,勿用。”

一、潜龙勿用——好奇心心智 (The Creative Mindset) Mans International
一、潜龙勿用——好奇心心智 (The Creative Mindset)

初创阶段,市场不知道你是谁,反而是最好的窗口期。太多人拿到一点技术就仓促下场,却连一个核心问题都没答透:这项技术,到底为谁、解决了什么具体的、比现有方案好十倍的问题?

好奇心心智是这一阶段唯一的燃料。不急于证明自己,不仓促下场厮杀,沉下去把行业痛点、技术边界、用户真实需求摸得一清二楚。正如《We Are As Gods》中传递的内核:人类掌控技术神力的第一步,从来不是急于建造,而是先保持对世界的纯粹追问。

沉得住气的潜龙,才有资格一飞冲天。

九二:见龙在田——富足心智 (The Abundance Mindset)

“见龙在田,利见大人。”

九二:见龙在田——富足心智 (The Abundance Mindset) Mans International
九二:见龙在田——富足心智 (The Abundance Mindset)

产品一上线,你就会直面现实:身边的对手算力比你强、数据比你多、融资额是你的几十倍。稀缺思维就是在这里杀死创始人的 —— 他们把 AI 当成一块固定大小的蛋糕,认定最终只会剩下几家巨头。

但富足心智的人看得懂本质:AI 正在把智能的边际成本推向零,整个蛋糕不是被分完,而是在被无限做大。几年前需要几十人工程团队才能搭建的系统,今天几个人靠 AI 工具就能完成。

稀缺者争夺存量,创造者定义增量。你不需要抢巨头的蛋糕,你要去烤一块以前根本不存在的新蛋糕。

九三:终日乾乾 ——长期主义心智 (The Longevity Mindset)

“君子终日乾乾,夕惕若厉,无咎。”

九三:终日乾乾 ——长期主义心智 (The Longevity Mindset) Mans International
九三:终日乾乾 ——长期主义心智 (The Longevity Mindset)

这是创业最磨人的阶段:白天全速推进业务,夜里仍忧思重重,身心都在高压边缘反复拉扯。绝大多数人不是输在能力,而是输在中途垮掉。

耶鲁大学公共卫生学院 Becca Levy 教授及其团队的长期追踪研究,对衰老持有更积极自我认知(positive self-perceptions of aging)的老年人,平均寿命长出约7.5年。对创始人而言,长期主义心智的本质,是把韧性当成组织的核心基础设施 —— 你永远不能靠透支的身体、涣散的团队去完成关键跃迁。

创业不是百米冲刺,是连续的跨栏跑。能扛过周期的人,才等得到风口。

九四:或跃在渊——指数型心智 (The Exponetial Mindset)

“或跃在渊,无咎。”

九四:或跃在渊——指数型心智 (The Exponetial Mindset) Mans International
九四:或跃在渊——指数型心智 (The Exponetial Mindset)

公司开始扩张,也进入最危险的跃迁期。

人类大脑天生习惯线性思考,但AI呈指数级进化。

指数思维的核心,是为 18 个月后的技术能力设计架构,而不是盯着当下的天花板。你要预判技术的跃迁,提前搭建能和模型智能复利增长同频扩张的产品底座与数据闭环。

以当下能力设限的人,从第一天就在建造一件过时的产品。

九五:飞龙在天——登月心智 (The Moonshot Mindset) + 场景成熟度 (Scenario Maturity)

“飞龙在天,利见大人。”

九五:飞龙在天——登月心智 (The Moonshot Mindset) + 场景成熟度 (Scenario Maturity) Mans International
九五:飞龙在天——登月心智 (The Moonshot Mindset) + 场景成熟度 (Scenario Maturity)

“登月心智”将“不可能”视为待解的工程问题。但没有着陆点的登月,只是制作精良的幻觉。

区分真正的飞龙和昂贵烟花的核心标尺,就是场景成熟度(Scenario Maturity)—— 别去评判技术牛不牛,要判断你选的这个具体场景,到底有没有真正具备起飞条件。

问自己三个灵魂问题:

  • 有没有真实买家,手握真实预算、带着真实紧迫感,愿意现在就买单?
  • 你的业务流程能不能生成正向反馈闭环,跑得越久,壁垒就越厚?
  • 当下的模型能力,能不能在真实使用场景里稳定、可靠地完成任务?

三个问题全部达标,野心才有落地的土壤;只追酷炫概念,最终只会摔得很惨。

案例:AI医疗平台 OpenEvidence

这家 AI 医疗决策平台,就是场景成熟度的完美范本。它不做泛泛的聊天机器人,只聚焦临床医生的诊疗决策场景:

OpenEvidence 案例
  • 商业精准:不凭空创造预算,切入现有药企营销体系 —— 医生免费使用,靠场景化药企广告变现;
  • 壁垒深厚:独家对接顶级医学期刊与机构,自有认证临床咨询闭环,数据资产越跑越厚;
  • 能力匹配:严格限定临床医学领域,让当前模型的可靠性足以支撑高风险场景。

从 2025 年 2 月估值 10 亿美元,到 2026 年 1 月突破 120 亿美元,全美 65% 的医生在使用,单月支撑 2700 万次临床咨询 —— 它的爆发,从来不是因为模型最先进,而是因为场景踩得最准。

上九:亢龙有悔——90% 的 AI 创业,死在飞得太早

“亢龙有悔。”

上九:亢龙有悔——90% 的 AI 创业,死在飞得太早 Mans International
上九:亢龙有悔——90% 的 AI 创业,死在飞得太早

很多人以为乾卦的终点是飞龙在天。但乾卦的第六爻,写的是一句冰冷的警示:「亢龙有悔。」

飞得过高的龙,终将迎来悔恨。

这正是当下无数 AI 创始人的缩影:把「接入了大模型」等同于「做成了生意」,把资本砸向最酷炫、最有话题度的方向,而不是最成熟、最有真实需求的场景。野心跑在了业务、数据、技术的前面,最终只能从高空坠落。

这条警示的真正含义是在每一个高度,都要停下来重新校验:你的商业闭环、你的数据积累、你的技术储备,真的配得上你想去的地方吗?

人类的终极护城河:判断力,永远高于数据

讲完了六阶成长,我们回到最本质的问题:当 AI 能瞬间处理所有信息,人类的优势到底在哪里?

橡树资本联合创始人霍华德·马克斯(Howard Marks),早在 AI 出现前就划出了这条分界线:

  • 第一层次思维止步于显而易见的结论;
  • 第二层次思维则追问别人遗漏了什么,以及随之而来的后果。
人类终极护城河 判断力 > 数据 Mans International
人类的终极护城河:判断力,永远高于数据

AI让第一层次思维变得免费,这迫使创始人和投资者的护城河全面上移至第二层次:

  1. 判断数据背后真实的二阶效应,而不只是读懂字面信息。
  2. 权衡无法被量化的事物——团队的韧性、场景的真实成熟度、行业的深层结构。
  3. 在市场达成共识前,凭信念决定哪个未来值得全力奔赴。

AI 是威力无穷的引擎,但它没有灵魂,没有意图。理解 AI 的局限,我们才能摆脱受害者心态,重新拿回创造者的主动权。

无论机器变得多么强大,评估场景、设定航向、决定去向哪里的,永远是人类。

不必畏惧那条名为 AI 的巨龙。找到你真正成熟的场景,然后,驾驭它。

Inside OpenEvidence’s $12B Rise: The Playbook Winning AI Companies Share

Inside OpenEvidence’s $12B Rise: The Playbook Winning AI Companies Share Mans International
Inside OpenEvidence’s $12B Rise: The Playbook Winning AI Companies Share Mans International
Inside OpenEvidence’s $12B Rise: The Playbook Winning AI Companies Share

In eleven months, OpenEvidence went from a $1 billion valuation to $12 billion. By April 2026, the company reported that its platform was being used by approximately 65% of US physicians and supported nearly 27 million clinical consultations that month, with much of its adoption attributed to physician word-of-mouth.

Think explosive growth is just about having the best AI tech? It’s not. If you look at the AI companies truly scaling today, their real competitive edge is deep market insight. Too many founders skip this step because they’re rushing to build something impressive instead.

Many view AI as a dragon coming to burn down their industry. But it also represents transformative and generative power. If you cannot outmuscle a force like that, you learn to ride it to become stronger.

As AI shifts from a simple tool to an autonomous agent, completing complex work with less and less human intervention, founders face a clear choice: draw a sword, or learn to fly.

Qian and the Anatomy of a Founder

The I Ching (Book of Changes), an ancient Chinese philosophical text, uses the dragon as a central metaphor in its first hexagram, Qian (The Creative). It tracks a dragon through six stages of maturation — from total obscurity to full command of the sky. It perfectly mirrors the modern founder’s journey.

Peter Diamandis, founder of the XPRIZE Foundation, describes five mindsets that keep people stable and effective through accelerating change: curiosity, abundance, exponential thinking, longevity, and moonshot thinking. Map them onto the dragon’s ascent and you get an operating system for building through the AI era — one altitude at a time, plus a warning at the top that most founders skip.

1. Hidden Dragon — The Curiosity Mindset

“The dragon is hidden. Do not act.”

1. Hidden Dragon — The Curiosity Mindset Mans International
1. Hidden Dragon — The Curiosity Mindset

At the earliest stage, the market doesn’t know you exist, and that’s fine. This is a research phase. The Curiosity Mindset is the fuel: what specific problem does this technology actually solve, for whom, better than the current alternative? Curiosity prevents premature action and allows you to deeply understand the landscape before making your move.

2. Dragon in the Field — The Abundance Mindset

“The dragon appears in the field. It furthers one to see the great man.”

2. Dragon in the Field — The Abundance Mindset Mans International
2. Dragon in the Field — The Abundance Mindset

You launch, and suddenly you’re standing next to other companies with more computing power, more data, and more capital than you’ll ever have. This is where scarcity thinking kills founders, treating AI as a fixed pie that a handful of giants will win.

An abundance mindset realizes that AI is driving the cost of intelligence toward zero, baking an infinitely larger pie. You now have the tools to build things that would have required a much larger engineering team just a few years ago.

3. The Diligent Dragon — The Longevity Mindset

3. The Diligent Dragon — The Longevity Mindset Mans International
3. The Diligent Dragon — The Longevity Mindset

“All day long the superior man is creatively active. At nightfall his mind is still beset with cares. Danger. No blame.”

This is the grind. You have entered the market and are building furiously, but the psychological and physical pressure is immense. You are active all day, yet anxious at night. To survive this perilous phase of non-stop execution, founders must adopt the Longevity Mindset.

A Yale study led by Professor Becca Levy found that older adults with more positive views of aging lived about 7.5 years longer. For founders, the Longevity Mindset applies this same logic to the body and the organization: you cannot reach the next stage on a burned-out founder or a brittle team. Resilience works as load-bearing infrastructure for the leap itself.

4. Leaping Dragon — The Exponential Mindset

4. Leaping Dragon — The Exponential Mindset Mans International
4. Leaping Dragon — The Exponential Mindset

“The dragon leaps over the abyss. No blame.”

This is the scaling phase, the most dangerous part of the journey. To cross the chasm, founders must adopt the Exponential Mindset.

Human brains are wired to think linearly, but AI advances exponentially. The Exponential Mindset means architecting for where the model will be in eighteen months, not where it is on launch day.

Founders who build their product roadmap against today’s capability ceiling are already building a legacy product. You must anticipate the leap, building infrastructure that scales with the compounding intelligence of the models themselves.

5. Flying Dragon — The Moonshot Mindset and Scenario Maturity

5. Flying Dragon — The Moonshot Mindset and Scenario Maturity Mans International
5. Flying Dragon — The Moonshot Mindset and Scenario Maturity

“The flying dragon is in the heavens. It furthers one to see the great man.”

The Moonshot Mindset treats “impossible” as an unsolved engineering problem rather than a wall. But a moonshot without a landing site is just a hallucination with better production values. What separates a flying dragon from an expensive fireworks show is Scenario Maturity — a check on whether the specific use case you’ve chosen, not the technology in general, is actually ready to fly.

That means asking harder questions, such as:

  • Is there a real buyer, with real budget and real urgency, ready to act now rather than someday?
  • Does the workflow generate a feedback loop that compounds in your favor the longer you run it?
  • Can today’s models actually do the job reliably at the point of use?

Get that match right, and the moonshot has somewhere to land. Chase ambition alone, and you’ve built a very well-funded crash.

Case in Point: Open Evidence

Open Evidence is an AI-powered medical search engine and clinical decision-support platform that allows verified healthcare professionals to ask complex medical questions and receive rapid answers grounded in peer-reviewed literature. It demonstrates scenario maturity through a precise, high-stakes alignment of buyer, monetization, moat, and capability match:

  • The Buyer & Monetization: Targeted physicians making time-sensitive decisions at the point of care. Instead of inventing a new budget, it tapped into existing pharmaceutical marketing dollars by keeping the tool free for verified doctors and monetizing via contextually relevant pharma advertising.
  • The Moat: Built exclusively on peer-reviewed medical journals and direct content partnerships with elite institutions like the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine. The data asset is compounded by proprietary, verified clinical consultation loops that competitors cannot easily replicate.
  • The Capability Match: Bounded the problem domain tightly to clinical medicine rather than attempting open-ended consumer chat, allowing current-generation models to maintain exceptional reliability.

That combination, not a superior model, is what turned a niche physician tool into the fastest-scaling case in the sector.

One Line Further: The Arrogant Dragon

One Line Further: The Arrogant Dragon Mans International
One Line Further: The Arrogant Dragon

The Qian hexagram doesn’t stop at the flying dragon. Its sixth and final line describes a dragon that has flown too high — an overreaching dragon with cause for regret. It’s the founder who mistakes access to a powerful model for scenario readiness, and pours capital into the most exciting application instead of the most prepared one.

The lesson isn’t to stop climbing. It’s to keep re-checking, at every altitude, whether the business, the data, and the technology are actually ready for where ambition wants to take you.

The Human Edge: Judgment Over Data

If AI can already process the available information instantly, where does human advantage come from?

Howard Marks, co-founder of Oaktree Capital, drew this line decades before anyone was worried about AI:

  • first-level thinking stops at the obvious conclusion;
  • second-level thinking asks what everyone else is missing, and what happens next because of it.

AI has made first-level thinking free — any model can summarize the data, the consensus, the obvious take, instantly. That pushes the entire edge left for founders and investors up to the second level:

  • Judging the second-order effects of what the data actually implies, not just what it states.
  • Weighing what can’t be measured — management quality, grit, the structural maturity of a scenario.
  • Deciding, on conviction, which future is worth building toward before the market has agreed with you.
The Human Edge: Judgment Over Data Mans International
The Human Edge: Judgment Over Data

AI is an incredibly powerful engine, but it lacks a soul. It lacks intent. Understanding the limitations of AI allows us to shed the victim mindset and reclaim our natural birthright as creators.

No matter how powerful the machine becomes, the human founder still evaluates the scenario and sets the destination – at least for now. We remain in charge of our lives, fully capable of shaping our own destinies.

Do not fear the dragon. Find your scenario, and ride it.

WAIC 2026 三大信号:医疗 AI 的竞争,已经从模型 IQ 转向场景 EQ

WAIC 2026 三大信号:医疗 AI 的竞争,已经从模型 IQ 转向场景 EQ Mans International
WAIC 2026 三大信号:医疗 AI 的竞争,已经从模型 IQ 转向场景 EQ Mans International
WAIC 2026 三大信号:医疗 AI 的竞争,已经从模型 IQ 转向场景 EQ

开源大模型遍地开花、推理 token 成本一降再降,那么,你到底拥有什么别人拿不走的东西?这个问题,贯穿了我对整个 WAIC 2026 的观察。

1100 多家企业,3000 多项展品。创始人和投资人关注的是哪些技术还停留在展台上,哪些产品已经开始接近可防御、可收费、可规模化的真实部署?

WAIC 2026 Mans International
WAIC 2026

依托更贴近商业本质的场景成熟度评估框架(SMAF),我们跳出单一的模型评测维度,重新审视那些真正具备竞争壁垒、可实现稳定营收的医疗 AI 落地项目。

我们从中梳理出三个最清晰的行业信号,而它们的成熟度,天差地别。

信号一:护城河,已经从模型转向了专有数据

本届大会一个明确的信号是:头部玩家早已不再拿通用大模型直接回答医疗问题,而是扎根独家数据,打造医疗增强大模型。当通用能力快速商品化,真正的壁垒,已经从 “模型做得好” 变成了 “数据独一份、场景扎得深”。

百川智能与北京儿童医院共建的「福棠・百川」儿科大模型,就是这一路径的标杆样本。

这套模型不是通用模型套上医疗语料的 “半成品”,而是深度整合了北京儿童医院 300 余位资深专家的临床经验,沉淀数十年高质量脱敏病历数据,覆盖儿科常见病到疑难罕见病的完整知识体系,首创儿科循证诊疗逻辑。

专有数据 Mans International

临床验证的结果足够有冲击力:在 60 份真实门诊病例的真人对照测试中,该模型诊断准确率达到 91.7%,比同场 12 位主治、住院医师的平均水平高出近 15 个百分点,儿科用药安全合规率也达到 92%,远超通用 AI 工具的表现。如今这套系统已经常态化落地倪鑫院长的多学科联合门诊,同时下沉到河北 150 余家县级医院。

这背后,恰恰戳中了中国医疗最痛的现实:顶级儿科专家高度集中在三甲医院,基层和县域长期缺乏优质医生。AI 的真正价值是让专家经验跨机构、跨地域流动,把顶级诊疗能力普惠下去。

SMAF 判断

静态数据集最终可能被复制,单次模型领先也可能很快被追平。

但一个已经嵌入诊疗流程、拥有持续反馈机制,并得到医生与医院信任的临床系统,替换成本要高得多。

因此,未来医疗AI的数据护城河,归结为三个核心问题:

  1. 这些数据能不能在合规前提下持续流动?
  2. 能不能持续转化为更好的临床结果?
  3. 能不能最终沉淀成用户离不开的高黏性?

信号二:具身智能很吸睛,但场景成熟度还没跟上

如果说医疗软件 AI 是本届大会的 “基本盘”,那么 AI + 具身智能的康养、康复机器人,就是全场最吸睛的 “流量担当”。

这其中有两类玩家的壁垒截然不同:

  1. 一类是以联影智能为代表的 “软硬一体” 派 —— 依托 “设备 – 数据 – 算法” 的完整栈结构,设备铺到哪里,AI 能力就能同步落地到哪里,这是纯软件 AI 公司很难复制的硬件护城河。
  2. 另一类是层出不穷的人形 / 服务机器人演示:银河辰的具身医疗机器人完成从问诊到照护的全流程执行;傅利叶智能的康复机器人听懂一句 “我渴了” 就能完成取物递水的完整闭环;光谷东智的康养机器人覆盖巡检、陪伴、健康管理全场景……
具身智能 Mans International

演示足够震撼,但从展台走进真实的医院病房、老人家里,还有三道演示里看不到的核心关卡:

  1. 安全关:照护对象多为失能老人、康复患者,身体脆弱,系统的容错率极低。需要多重安全冗余与失效保护,远不是实验室里能稳定运行就够。
  2. 隐私关:贴身陪伴意味着持续采集高度敏感的健康与生活数据,不能只靠一份用户协议打天下,必须有清晰的数据边界与完整的授权机制。
  3. 人文关:照护的本质是 “托举”,不是完成任务。一件衣服叠得再整齐、一杯水递得再精准,如果没有尊严、安全感和情绪信任,就没有解决照护的真正痛点。

SMAF 判断

具身智能在医疗养老领域呈现出典型的“技术潜力很高、场景成熟度有限”特征。

医院内部物流、设备巡检、物资搬运等标准化、低接触、责任边界清晰的场景,有望率先成熟。

而家庭护理、老人陪伴和高风险身体协助,由于环境开放、行为不可预测、伦理责任复杂,商业化周期明显更长。

信号三:窄切口、真付费,小团队也能快速跑通成熟度

本届 WAIC 最让人惊喜的创业故事,不是大厂的重磅发布,也不是实验室的技术突破,而是一个一人公司(OPC)跑出的项目 ——TideFlow AI 个性化睡眠决策系统。

医疗 AI OPC Mans International

创始人吴松芸没有医学背景,创业的起点只是自己长期受失眠困扰的真实体验。 她的核心洞察很精准:很多人失眠不是环境不好,而是大脑长期处于高唤醒状态,没法自然从清醒过渡到睡眠。TideFlow 用 AI 实时感知用户状态,动态匹配放松音频、呼吸引导等干预方案,帮大脑自然入睡,区别于市面上千篇一律的白噪音、冥想产品。

就是这样一个轻量的小团队,靠 12 次快速产品迭代,不仅拿下了 WAIC OPC 成都站冠军、登上全球总决赛舞台,更已经收获了海外真实付费用户,跑出了轻资产的商业闭环。

SMAF 判断

这就是场景成熟度的 “快车道” 范本:痛点足够窄、定义足够清晰,创始人离用户足够近、能快速迭代,而付费用户的认可,比任何融资轮次都更能证明产品价值。

融资可以放大验证结果,却不能替代验证本身。

Mans International 结语

这场产业迭代的本质,是中国医疗 AI 的竞争逻辑正在发生结构性重塑—— 行业核心已经从”模型智力(Model IQ)”,全面转向”场景情商(Scenario EQ)”。这不是短期的技术风口,而是整个赛道价值创造、价值捕获、壁垒构建的底层更替。

驾驭这种结构性变化,只看财报数据和模型参数远远不够。它需要对中国医疗体制痛点的深刻理解,对监管边界的精准判断,更需要一套专业框架,去系统评估场景成熟度、识别真正的战略缺口 —— 这也正是 SMAF(场景成熟度评估框架)的设计初衷。

从 Model IQ 到场景 EQ Mans International

最后想问问每一位医疗 AI 创业者与投资人: 你的 AI 战略,到底是为了在展台上赢得一阵掌声,还是为了真正破解 “排队三小时,看病五分钟” 的行业真困境?

如果你正在判断一个医疗 AI 项目的真实成熟度,或是想把中国医疗 AI 产品推向全球市场,SMAF 框架正是为解决这类问题而生。欢迎交流,我们一起拆解场景、找准路径。

Mans International 专注以 SMAF 场景成熟度评估框架,帮助医疗 AI 创业者与投资人区分「技术就绪度」与「场景就绪度」,深耕中国与全球市场的跨境产业桥梁服务。

WAIC 2026: When Medical AI Moves Beyond the Model

WAIC 2026: When Medical AI Moves Beyond the Model Mans International

Your tokens are cheap. Your model is open-source. So what do you actually own?

That question shaped my review of WAIC 2026, held in Shanghai.

More than 1,100 companies presented over 3,000 exhibits. But the real divide was not between larger and smaller models. It was between technologies that attract attention and those approaching defensible, revenue-generating deployment.

WAIC 2026 Shanghai

Over three days, I examined the most relevant medical AI cases through the Mans International SMAF lens: the Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework, which looks beyond model parameters to assess proprietary data, workflow integration, buyer readiness, trust and commercial scalability.

Three trends stood out and they were not equally mature.

Trend 1: The moat moved from the model to the data

Leading companies are no longer applying general models directly to medical questions; they are building “medically enhanced large models” grounded in exclusive data.

A prime example is Baichuan Intelligence’s “Futang·Baichuan’s pediatric model. It was developed with Beijing Children’s Hospital using the clinical expertise of more than 300 paediatric specialists and decades of high-quality, de-identified medical records.

The results are striking: in a head-to-head against 12 attending and resident physicians on 60 real outpatient cases, it hit 91.7% diagnostic accuracy, nearly 15 points above the human average, with 92% medication-safety compliance. It now lives in daily multidisciplinary clinics and is rolled out to 150+ county hospitals in Hebei.

Trend 1: The moat moved from the model to the data Mans International
Trend 1: The moat moved from the model to the data

China also presents a compelling initial scenario. Leading paediatric expertise is concentrated in major hospitals, while primary-care and county-level institutions often lack experienced specialists. AI could help distribute medical expertise more widely, not by replacing doctors, but by allowing expert knowledge to travel across institutions and regions.

SMAF read: A static dataset can eventually be copied. A clinical system that improves through validated feedback from each deployment becomes increasingly trusted and harder to replace.

Trend 2: Embodied AI is dazzling — and still maturity-gated

United Imaging Intelligence’s equipment-data-algorithm stack is a real hardware moat that pure software players can’t easily copy. And the humanoid demos were the crowd favorite: Galaxy General’s “AstraBrain” architecture driving a robot through folding laundry and making breakfast; Fourier Intelligence’s GR-3 Care-bot executing a full intent-to-action loop from a spoken “I’m thirsty”; Optics Valley Dongzhi’s “Photon” robots handling patrol, companionship, and health monitoring in elder-care settings.

Trend 2: Embodied AI is dazzling — and still maturity-gated Mans International
Trend 2: Embodied AI is dazzling — and still maturity-gated

Impressive. Not yet mature. Getting a robot from a booth into a home or hospital means clearing three hurdles that don’t show up in a product demo:

  1. Safety — the care recipients are disabled or elderly; failure tolerance is close to zero.
  2. Privacy — continuous in-home data collection needs real consent architecture, not a terms-of-service checkbox.
  3. Humanity — the job is care, not just task completion. A robot that folds shirts perfectly but feels clinical hasn’t solved the actual problem.

SMAF read: high potential, low current maturity. This is the category where the technology outpaces the scenario — worth watching, not yet worth pricing as though it’s solved.

Trend 3: Narrow problem, Real payers — OPC models are proving maturity can be earned fast

The most interesting founder story at WAIC wasn’t a lab spinout. TideFlow AI, an “AI personalized sleep decision system” was built solo by Wu Songyun, no medical background, just her own struggle with insomnia.

Trend 3: Narrow problem, Real payers - OPC models are proving maturity can be earned fast Mans International
Trend 3: Narrow problem, Real payers — OPC models are proving maturity can be earned fast

TideFlow’s core insight is that insomnia often stems not from a poor environment, but from a hyperaroused brain. The system uses AI to perceive the user’s state in real-time, dynamically matching intervention plans to help the brain naturally transition into sleep. After 12 iterations, this highly personalized, lightweight business architecture stepped onto the global stage, acquiring real paying users overseas.

SMAF read: this is what fast-tracked maturity looks like — a narrow, well-defined pain point, a founder close enough to it to iterate quickly, and payers who validate the solution before the funding round does.

The Mans International Takeaway

In this profound transformation, the core of industry competition is undergoing a structural reshaping from “Model IQ” to “Scenario EQ.” This is not short-term technological hype; it is a fundamental shift in the logic of value creation, capture, and defense.

Navigating this structural change requires far more than financial reports and model parameters. It demands a precise grasp of regulatory boundaries and a professional analytical framework capable of systematically assessing scenario maturity and identifying strategic gaps. This is precisely the design intent behind the Mans International SMAF.

Ultimately, every medical AI participant must confront a fundamental question: Is your AI strategy designed to win brief applause at the exhibition booth, or to truly crack the real industry dilemma of waiting three hours to see a doctor for five minutes?

If you’re trying to figure out where a specific medical AI bet actually sits on that maturity curve — or how to position a product for international scaling — that’s the exact gap SMAF was built to close. Happy to compare notes.

Mans International SMAF Sprint 2026

Mans International applies the Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework to help technology founders and investors distinguish technical readiness from commercial, workflow and ecosystem readiness—particularly across China and international markets.

从模型IQ到场景EQ:DeepSeek为何死磕“情感智能”?

从模型IQ到场景EQ:DeepSeek为何死磕“情感智能”?Mans International
从模型IQ到场景EQ:DeepSeek为何死磕“情感智能”?Mans International
从模型IQ到场景EQ:DeepSeek为何死磕“情感智能”?

根据胡润研究院发布的《2026全球独角兽榜》,DeepSeek以3400亿元人民币估值跻身全球前 15 名。

在 DeepSeek 最新的招聘名单中有一个看似小众的岗位,正在成为全行业的风向标 ——情感智能数据产品经理

这个岗位的核心任务,是搭建情商与意图理解的评测体系,把真实世界里模糊不清的情绪、潜台词、言外之意,拆解成大模型可量化、可训练、可迭代的标准步骤。

建议先观看上方视频洞察,再向下阅读完整战略拆解。

SMAF 诊断:情感 AI 的真正壁垒在哪里?

SMAF(Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework,场景成熟度评估框架)是我用来对 AI 产品商业生态准备度进行“压力测试”的核心工具。站在 SMAF 的视角审视, DeepSeek 的最新招聘,行业信号非常清晰:

“大模型的下半场,不再是‘模型 IQ’的技术内卷,而是‘场景 EQ’的商业化落地之战。”

SMAF 诊断:情感 AI 的真正壁垒在哪里?Mans International

在真实的商业交互中,算法面临的挑战远比跑分榜单复杂得多:

  • 什么时候,用户是真的生气?
  • 什么时候,用户只是陷入沉默?
  • 什么时候,用户嘴上说“没事”,但实际上已经彻底失去信任?
  • 什么时候,客户说“再看看”,背后其实是预算、风险、组织阻力或文化语境的深层错位?

这些精微的判断,无法单靠模型规模的扩大自然生长出来。它们需要被系统观察、精细化标注、标准化评测、针对性训练,并最终持续沉淀进产品的反馈闭环中。

换句话说,情感智能的核心壁垒,本质上是“场景数据成熟度(Data Maturity)”的问题。

在 SMAF 框架中,数据成熟度不是“拥有更多数据”,而是企业能否把真实场景中模糊、碎片化、非标准化的情绪信号,转化为可评测、可训练、可迭代、可商业化的完整数据闭环(Closed-loop flywheel)

这也正是“情感智能数据产品经理”值得所有创始人和投资人深度关注的原因:

它不是一个偏向人文的“软岗位”,而是一个非常硬核的商业信号——AI 正在从“回答问题”的工具阶段,进入“理解人性”的复杂场景阶段。

Woebot 给情感 AI 行业留下的提醒

Woebot Health 曾是全球数字心理健康赛道的标杆级先行者。凭借将认知行为疗法(CBT)工具化融入对话交互的开创性设计,它一度在 AI 心理支持领域建立起极强的行业辨识度。然而,根据官方公告,其面向 C 端用户的 Woebot App 已于2025 年 6 月 30 日正式停止服务。

The Woebot Reality Check: 临床背书 ≠ 商业飞轮

这是一场值得全行业深度复盘的现实校验。脱胎于斯坦福学术体系、手握 FDA 突破性设备认定,Woebot 拥有绝大多数同行难以企及的临床背书。但它始终未能搭建起可持续运转的商业飞轮(Closed-loop flywheel)。

站在SMAF(场景成熟度评估框架)的透镜下审视,这并非科学或算法的失败,而是典型的场景成熟度缺口(Scenario Maturity Gap)——叙事定位、工作流融合与商业模式三者成熟度的严重错位。

The Woebot Reality Check: 临床背书 ≠ 商业飞轮 Mans International
The Woebot Reality Check: 临床背书 ≠ 商业飞轮

它的停运,不能直接否定 AI 心理健康的庞大需求,也不代表 Woebot Health 彻底退出赛道。但它给整个情感 AI 行业留下了一个极其冷酷的警示:

扎实的临床研究、顺滑的产品体验、真实的用户需求,甚至官方的监管认可,都不会自动拼接成一套可持续运转的商业飞轮。

SMAF灵魂拷问:情感AI必须跨越的六道鸿沟

一款数字心理健康或情感 AI 产品要真正跑通商业闭环,不能仅停留在技术自嗨,必须在 SMAF 框架下同时回答以下六个核心问题:

  1. Procurement Trigger(采购触发点):谁是真正的付费主体?是C端用户、企业员工福利部门、保险机构,还是医疗服务机构?产品解决的问题是否足够紧迫,能够进入一个明确、持续的预算科目?
  2. Workflow Embedding(工作流嵌入):产品能否自然进入用户已有的医疗服务、员工关怀或日常健康管理流程?还是需要用户额外下载、学习并主动打开一个长期孤立的App?
  3. Retention & Flywheel(留存与飞轮):用户为什么持续使用,而不是短暂尝鲜?长期交互是否能够形成可验证、可持续的数据反馈闭环,并推动产品能力和用户价值同步提升?
  4. Role Boundary(角色与责任边界):AI和专业人员之间如何分工?产品提供的是信息支持、情绪陪伴、行为引导,还是涉及临床判断与干预?不同角色对应的责任、风险和合规要求是否已经明确?
  5. Risk Escalation(风险升级机制):当模型无法判断、出现幻觉,或者识别到潜在的高风险心理状态时,产品如何升级至人工支持或专业服务?这一机制是否及时、可追踪,并符合当地监管与伦理要求?
  6. Outcome Measurement(结果度量):企业如何证明产品创造了真实结果?它改善的是用户健康状态、服务效率和风险管理,还是仅仅增加了使用时长、对话次数与App日活??
SMAF灵魂拷问:情感AI必须跨越的六道鸿沟 Mans International

这六个问题并不是情感AI商业化的完整答案,而是判断场景是否具备基本成熟度的起点。

模型可以识别情绪,不代表企业已经找到了付费方;用户愿意聊天,不代表产品能够形成留存;监管认可、临床研究和高互动率,也不会自动形成可持续的商业飞轮。

技术证明产品能够工作。场景成熟度决定它能否被购买、被信任并持续运行。

如果你正在构建下一代情感 AI 产品,或者正在筹备 AI 产品的全球化与跨区域落地,不要只盯着模型参数量与跑分榜单。真正决定胜负的,是你对场景的理解深度,以及对人性的精准把握。

执行力是廉价的,场景洞察力是昂贵的 Mans International

欢迎在评论区聊聊:你所在的行业,有哪些被忽略的 “情绪摩擦” 正在成为业务瓶颈?

如果你希望对自身业务做一次完整的场景成熟度评估,也欢迎私信联系,预约定向邀请制的场景成熟度审计服务。我们将输出完整的场景成熟度定级与跨文化落地缺口清单,帮你在投入重金之前,先看清商业生态的真实底牌。

AI’s Next 99.5% Opportunity: Why the Winners Will Be Built Beyond SaaS

AI’s Next 99.5% Opportunity: Why the Winners Will Be Built Beyond SaaS Mans International
AI’s Next 99.5% Opportunity: Why the Winners Will Be Built Beyond SaaS Mans International
AI’s Next 99.5% Opportunity: Why the Winners Will Be Built Beyond SaaS

The 0.5% SaaS Trap: AI’s “Pixar Moment”

In the early 1980s, Pixar wasn’t a film studio. It was a struggling hardware company born inside Lucasfilm and backed by Steve Jobs. They built the Pixar Image Computer — a sleek, powerful machine designed for medical imaging and scientific visualization.

Nobody wanted it. No hospitals, no research labs, not even George Lucas. As Pixar bled cash, they had one odd advantage: a tiny in-house team making short animated clips just to demonstrate what the hardware could do. The hardware flopped, but the clips blew people’s minds.

So, Pixar made a radical creative leap: they stopped selling the silicon and started selling the story. They stopped optimizing a tool and reimagined its ultimate purpose. The result was Toy Story, and it rewrote the economics of Hollywood.

The 0.5% SaaS Trap: AI’s “Pixar Moment” Mans International
The 0.5% SaaS Trap: AI’s “Pixar Moment”

Today, AI founders are facing their own “Pixar moment.” Too many are obsessing over the underlying technology, the tool itself, while missing the grander narrative of the market: delivering undeniable, real-world outcomes.

This fixation has led to what can be called the 0.5% SaaS trap: founders are optimizing for the easiest layer of AI adoption while completely missing the massive 99.5% opportunity waiting in the real economy.

The Canary in the SaaS Coal Mine

Goldman Sachs recently published a sobering metric for the tech ecosystem: software services (SaaS) represent less than 0.5% of global GDP. The remaining 99.5% belongs to the physical world — manufacturing, energy, logistics, healthcare, construction, and robotics.

For the past year, we’ve watched software companies face a massive reality check. The ten largest holdings in a major software ETF collectively shed nearly $800 billion in market cap. This isn’t because software is dying; it’s because AI is breaking the traditional SaaS business model.

The old assumptions — that pricing should be based on user seats, that more users equal more value, or that adding a basic wrapper creates a defensive moat — are collapsing. As autonomous AI agents begin to do the actual work, value is shifting away from software access and moving directly toward trusted, physical outcomes.

The Canary in the SaaS Coal Mine Mans International
The Canary in the SaaS Coal Mine

The capital is already moving. Look at Prometheus, the AI engineering startup backed by Jeff Bezos that recently raised $12 billion at a $41 billion valuation. They aren’t building a better chatbot to write marketing emails; they are building an AI engineer to design physical jet engines and complex industrial systems.

The real battleground is the remaining 99.5% of the economy. But conquering it requires playing by an entirely different set of rules.

The 5 Laws of Industrial AI

In software, an AI hallucination wastes tokens. A confident but wrong AI answer isn’t just a product bug. In industrial settings, it can quickly turn into a trust and liability problem. Goldman Sachs highlights five capabilities that may separate industrial-AI leaders from commoditized competitors:

  1. Physics-Based Architecture: AI must understand materials, motion, temperature and mechanical constraints — not just language.
  2. Proprietary Operational Data: The strongest moats will come from private deployment data, including failures, edge cases and real-world operating patterns.
  3. Edge Deployment: Critical systems cannot depend entirely on cloud connectivity. Intelligence must often run locally for speed, reliability and safety.
  4. Certifiability: In regulated environments, technical performance is insufficient. The system must be demonstrably predictable, controllable and safe.
  5. Workflow Integration: Customers will not rebuild their operations around a new tool. The highest-value AI becomes a seamless capability layer inside existing workflows.
The 5 Laws of Industrial AI Mans International

The Hidden Risk: Is Your Scenario Mature?

Goldman Sachs maps the technical requirements for the real economy. But for founders and investors, technical readiness is only half the battle. The greater risk is commercial readiness.

This is where the Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework (SMAF) becomes essential.

A technology can perform brilliantly and still fail to scale because the commercial environment around it is not ready. When industrial AI stalls, the problem is often not the product itself, but the scenario in which it is being applied. Three questions expose the gap:

  • The Buyer & Budget: Are you selling to a specific operational buyer with a P&L, or pitching “abstract efficiency” that no single department actually owns?
  • The Integration Friction: Can the product fit into existing operations, or must the customer redesign its workflow before receiving value?
  • The Value Capture: Are you selling software access to an industrial buyer who only cares about measurable operational and financial outcomes?
Is Your Scenario Mature? Mans International

Remember Pixar? Their Image Computer was technically brilliant. But the scenario was immature. They were applying a world-class capability to the struggling hardware scenario — until they pivoted to a more valuable outcome: computer-generated storytelling.

The next generation of AI winners will not necessarily have the most sophisticated models. They will be the companies that translate AI into outcomes that are trusted, workflow-integrated and commercially measurable.

When the technology works but adoption and revenue stall, do not immediately assume the product has failed. Audit the scenario.

At Mans International, we help deep-tech founders and investors identify where commercialization is breaking down—whether the answer is stronger workflow integration, a better value-capture model or a more mature market application.

From Model IQ to Scenario EQ: DeepSeek’s Emotional Data Pivot and AI’s Next Moat

From Model IQ to Scenario EQ: DeepSeek's Emotional Data Pivot and AI's Next Moat Mans International

Here is the signal most founders and investors missed:

A Chinese AI company reportedly raised US$7.4 billion at around a US$50 billion valuation, cracking the global top 15 unicorns.

That company is DeepSeek — one of China’s most watched AI labs, known for challenging the global AI race with high-performing, cost-efficient large language models.

Yet after reportedly closing a massive funding round of over US$7.4 billion, or 50 billion RMB, its immediate next move was not simply a public computing-power expansion or another race to cut parameter costs. Instead, it launched a comprehensive hiring wave across 7 categories and 33 roles.

Among them, one role deserves particular attention from founders and investors: Emotional Intelligence Data Product Manager.

DeepSeek Emotional Intelligence Data Product Manager

The core responsibility of this role is about turning complex, ambiguous human emotions and intentions into evaluation systems, training workflows, and product feedback loops.

The Next AI Battle Is Not Only Model IQ. It Is Scenario EQ.

Through the lens of SMAF — Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework, our active framework to stress-test an AI company’s commercial ecosystem and value-capture architecture, DeepSeek’s hiring signal points to a deeper shift: 

The next phase of AI commercialization will not be won only by higher model IQ. It will be won by stronger scenario EQ.

The Next AI Battle Is Not Only Model IQ. It Is Scenario EQ.

Can the AI detect when a customer is truly angry? Can it understand when a patient says “I’m fine,” but is actually anxious, confused, or losing trust? Can it recognize when a buyer says “let us think about it,” but the real blocker is budget, internal politics, risk perception, or cultural mismatch?

These are not simple sentiment-analysis problems. They are scenario-maturity problems.

Emotional Intelligence Is a Data Maturity Problem

In SMAF, data maturity does not mean owning more data. It means the ability to convert messy, fragmented, non-standard signals from real use cases into a repeatable loop: 

Observe → Label → Evaluate → Train → Deploy → Learn Again

Emotional Intelligence Is a Data Maturity Problem Mans International

This is precisely why the “Emotional Intelligence Data Product Manager” is an essential marker for founders and institutional investors. This is not an abstract, soft-skill humanities role; it is a hard commercial signal. AI is graduating from the basic tool phase of answering questions to the complex scenario phase of decoding human intent.

Furthermore, as AI leaders shift from model-centric competition to usage-efficiency and token-economics discipline, scenario accuracy becomes a direct P&L issue. High Scenario EQ means fewer wasted interactions, fewer misinterpreted prompts, fewer repeated explanations, and fewer costly friction loops. 

In enterprise AI, understanding the scenario correctly is not merely a product advantage but a path to more sustainable profitability.

The Mans International View: East–West Scenario Splintering

Technology may travel globally, but emotional intelligence does not move across markets in a straight line. 

The same underlying model capability can face completely different maturity paths in North America, China, and other markets. I call this Scenario Splintering: when one technology enters different cultural, regulatory, workflow, and business environments — and each environment demands a different product logic.

  • The US Paradigm (Persona & Deep Alignment): Pioneers like Character.ai and Replika established an early blueprint for highly individualized relationship building, utilizing Conversation Designers, Psychology Researchers, and Dialogue Data Experts to curate explicit “personas” and empathetic baselines.
  • The China Paradigm (Rapid Vertical Embedding): Domestic players like Emoha (聆心智能) trained models directly on clinical counseling data to deploy its series across over 600 specific mental health, university, and enterprise scenarios. Following its integration with Zhipu to power CharacterGLM, the priority shifted to cross-ecosystem scale — immediately embedding empathetic capabilities into gaming NPCs, virtual companions, and digital human assets to maximize immediate commercial velocity.
The Mans International View: East–West Scenario Splintering

The Strategic Trap: Copy-pasting Western “clinical AI” to the East usually dies because users won’t pay for a “diagnostic” experience. Pushing Eastern “heavy-companion AI” to the West usually dies under privacy scrutiny. Cross-border Emotional AI requires Scenario Reconstruction (Cultural Translation), not just code translation.

The Woebot Reality Check

Look at Woebot Health. Despite its Stanford roots and FDA breakthrough designation, it has struggled to build a sustainable commercial flywheel.

Under the SMAF lens, this is a classic case of misalignment in narrative, workflow, and business model maturity. While their clinical narrative was strong, their workflow maturity struggled to seamlessly integrate into existing fragmented healthcare systems, and their business model faced friction reconciling the high costs of medical compliance with shifting B2B enterprise budgets. Having the best clinical design doesn’t matter if the commercial scenario isn’t mature enough to sustain the business.

The Woebot Reality Check Mans International

Execution is becoming easier. Scenario Intelligence is becoming more valuable.

At Mans International, this is the core of our SMAF work: helping founders, investors, and cross-border technology teams evaluate whether a promising AI product has matured enough to become a real commercial system.

If you are currently building the next generation of affective interfaces, or orchestrating a cross-border tech launch between Western innovation and Eastern scale, look beyond the leaderboard benchmarks.

Contact Mans International to schedule a private, selective Scenario Maturity Audit. Let’s assess your structural gaps and secure your commercial roadmap before your next major deployment.

An ALS breakthrough: A master class in Deep-Tech Ecosystem Building, Founder Resilience, and SMAF

An ALS breakthrough: A master class in Deep-Tech Ecosystem Building, Founder Resilience, and SMAF Mans International

Mans International SMAF Sprint 2026

The I Ching (Book of Changes) states: “Heaven’s movement is ever vigorous; thus, the noble person constantly strives for self-improvement.” This underlying force of relentless self-renewal, regardless of the circumstances, has found its most extreme validation in the practice of Mr. Cai Lei.

An ALS breakthrough: A master class in Deep-Tech Ecosystem Building, Founder Resilience, and SMAF Mans International
An ALS breakthrough: A master class in Deep-Tech Ecosystem Building, Founder Resilience, and SMAF

In 2019, Mr. Cai Lei, a former vice president of JD.com and one of the pioneers behind China’s electronic invoice system, was diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS. He was 41. He had just welcomed a new child. His career, family, and life were all at a peak moment.

Then came the diagnosis. ALS is often described as one of the most devastating neurodegenerative diseases. The average survival window after diagnosis is often only a few years.

Seven years later, in 2026, his body function score plummeted from 48 to 4. He is completely paralyzed from the neck down, his vocal cords have severely atrophied, and he relies on a liquid diet and a 24-hour ventilator to survive. Across his entire body, only his eyes remain under his autonomous control.

Cai Lei before and after ALS Mans International
Cai Lei before and after ALS

Yet, Cai Lei’s story is far more than an inspiring narrative of resilience and empathy. Analyzed through the Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework (SMAF), it stands as a textbook masterclass in deep-tech scenario breakthroughs. It is a blueprint of how to take a globally recognized “unsolvable dead end” and reconstruct it into a high-maturity, self-sustaining ecosystem of research collaboration and commercial translation.

I. Deconstructing the Breakthrough via SMAF: A High-Maturity Super Ecosystem

At Mans International, we utilize the SMAF (Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework) to evaluate the commercial viability and translation potential of deep tech ventures. We have seen too many projects perish in the “slide deck” phase or or “lab-only self-indulgences.”

From a scenario maturity perspective, the true brilliance of Cai Lei’s “ice-breaking” initiative is not simply his unwavering belief, but his methodical execution. He took a highly fragmented, chronically inefficient rare-disease scenario — one lacking adequate resource attention — and orchestrated it into a synchronized system uniting patients, data, research, clinical trials, capital, AI, and public trust.

1. Data and Workflows: From Scattered Patients to R&D Infrastructure

One of the greatest bottlenecks in rare disease R&D is scattered patient populations, scarce biological samples, and a lack of real-world data. Often, research does not lack direction; it lacks a stable, continuous, and actionable data foundation.

  • The Data Engine: Cai Lei built the “Jianyu Mutual Aid Home,” the world’s largest civilian ALS research database (over 18,000 registered users), housing tens of thousands of structured real-world cases. He also launched an “ALS Research AI Brain,” training 24/7 on over 20 million interdisciplinary papers to automatically filter and evolve targets without burdening researchers.
  • The Workflow: This 360-degree dynamic vital-sign tracking system compresses notoriously slow clinical recruitment to astonishing speeds — achieving “hour-level” responsiveness (i.e. 700 sign-ups in 2 hours; launching clinical trials within 3 months).
Data and Workflows: From Scattered Patients to R&D Infrastructure Mans International
Data and Workflows: From Scattered Patients to R&D Infrastructure

2. The Business Closed Loop: A Mechanism for Long-Term Sustenance

Rare disease research cannot survive solely on short-term donations or one-off grants. Drug discovery features long cycles, high failure rates, and relentless capital demands, while external funding environments and public attention fluctuate. Without a stable financial engine, even the grandest mission will bleed out mid-way.

The partnership forged between Cai Lei and his wife, Duan Rui, perfectly demonstrates the synergy of vision and operations. Many view Duan Rui’s live-streaming efforts purely as a “wife’s sacrifice.” While deeply moving and true, from a strategic perspective, it is a brilliantly designed commercial closed loop.

Cai Lei continually raises the ceiling of their mission — connecting patients, scientists, pharma, and society. Meanwhile, Duan Rui absorbs the immense operational realities: live-streaming revenue, team management, cash flow, cost control, and risk mitigation. This closed-loop of “front-end commercial revenue funding back-end R&D burn” provides a continuous lifeline for a highly uncertain, long-cycle scientific endeavour.

The Business Closed Loop: A Mechanism for Long-Term Sustenance Mans International
The Business Closed Loop: A Mechanism for Long-Term Sustenance

3. Narrative & Ecosystem: Evolving from Empathy to Industry Consensus

Before Cai Lei, ALS was trapped in a weak narrative within public and industry discourse — viewed merely as an “incurable and unprofitable” tragedy. It garnered generalized sympathy but lacked actionable pathways.

Cai Lei elevated this narrative fundamentally. He did not stop at emotional appeals for awareness; he broke down rare-disease R&D into actionable industry propositions. He allowed the scientific community, the biotech industry, and the public to clearly see their specific roles and value.

This mature narrative has penetrated industry silos, uniting over 60 global research teams and 50+ biotech companies, transforming an untouched “cold sector” into a highly coordinated battlefield with shared consensus, pooled resources, and a synchronized tempo.

Narrative & Ecosystem: Evolving from Empathy to Industry Consensus
Mans International
Narrative & Ecosystem: Evolving from Empathy to Industry Consensus

II. The Founder’s Mirror: Resilience for Global Founders

In his recent “Countdown” speech on Global ALS Day, June 21, 2026, Cai Lei said he had already defeated an enemy more terrifying than ALS: despair.

For founders today — navigating agonizing market cycles and high-stakes survival tests — Cai Lei’s mental fortitude serves as a profound mirror:

  1. Reject the Victim Mentality. Complaining about the macro environment or the “capital winter” yields zero value. Completely paralyzed and unable to speak, Cai Lei never wallowed in the unfairness of fate. He immediately pivoted his strategy, utilizing an eye-tracking device to launch a race against time. Radical acceptance and execution to the absolute limit are the foundational ethics of a founder.
  2. Pry Open Incremental Gaps in Dead Ends. Cai Lei noted: “You might think there is only a solid wall in front of you. But look down, there might be a path; turn sideways, there is a gap. You can even choose to climb over or dig through.” When traditional funding tightens and cross-border barriers rise, a founder’s core competency is leveraging tools — like AI and cross-disciplinary ecosystems — to pry open growth spaces ignored by the mainstream.
  3. Anchor Your Venture in a Grand Proposition. “The best way to overcome fear is to place yourself within a much greater cause.” When your corporate vision is tied to core societal challenges — hard tech breakthroughs, life sciences, energy transitions — the resilience you unlock will far surpass what secular fame or profit can sustain.
Pry Open Incremental Gaps in Dead Ends Mans International
Pry Open Incremental Gaps in Dead Ends

III. Conclusion: The Countdown is a Prelude to Victory

In Cai Lei’s room, four clocks sit ticking. The media calls it the countdown of his life. He corrects them: “This is my countdown to ALS.”

“If my eyes fail, I will connect to a Brain-Computer Interface. If my brain stops turning, I will upload my consciousness to an embodied robot. I have marched all the way to the face of this terminal illness, and I am not here to surrender.”

As heaven’s movement is ever vigorous, so must a leader ceaselessly strive along.

The Countdown is a Prelude to Victory
 Mans International
The Countdown is a Prelude to Victory

Here is to all the founders who keep walking through the valleys of economic cycles. Here is to the researchers grinding relentlessly in their labs. Here is to all those who refuse to bow to fate.

Do not ask where the hope lies. Keep moving forward, and hope will reveal itself. As long as you do not retreat, every direction is the way forward.

Global Strategic Partnership

Leading global research institutions, multinational pharmaceutical companies, biotech innovators, and international funds are invited to partner with Mans International to access and navigate high-maturity life science and deep-tech ecosystems.

Through our SMAF — Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework — we help identify where technology, capital, clinical resources, market readiness, and ecosystem trust can be precisely aligned.

Our goal is to reduce cross-border and cross-sector friction, accelerate clinical and commercial translation, and support breakthrough technologies and strategic capital in moving from promise to real-world impact.

蔡磊的最后一次创业:当旧地图失效创始人如何重构一个无解场景?

蔡磊的最后一次创业:当旧地图失效创始人如何重构一个无解场景?Mans International

导语:

《易经・乾卦》有云:“天行健,君子以自强不息。” 这份无论处于哪种际遇,都能尽己所能的底层力量,在蔡磊的实践中得到了最极致的印证。

2019 年,41 岁的蔡磊确诊渐冻症(ALS)。彼时他身为京东副总裁、中国电子发票第一人,刚迎来新生命,正处于事业与家庭的双重巅峰。而医生给出的 2-5 年平均生存期,为他按下了冰冷的人生倒计时。

蔡磊的最后一次创业:当旧地图失效创始人如何重构一个无解场景?Mans International
蔡磊的最后一次创业:当旧地图失效创始人如何重构一个无解场景?

七年后的今天,他的身体功能评分从 48 分跌至 4 分,脖颈以下完全瘫痪,声带彻底萎缩,依赖流食与 24 小时呼吸机维持生命,全身上下仅剩双眼可以自主控制。

蔡磊的故事,远不止一场关于抗争与共情的励志叙事,从产业视角出发,用 SMAF(场景成熟度评估框架)拆解便会发现:这更是一场教科书级的深科技场景破局 —— 一套完整的成熟度体系,将全球医学界公认的 “无解绝境”,重构为高成熟度、自循环的科研协作与产业转化生态。

一、SMAF 框架深度拆解:蔡磊的 “破冰之战”,为何是罕见病领域的高成熟度超级生态

在 Mans International,我们使用SMAF(场景成熟度评估框架 / Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework) 来评估深科技与跨国项目的落地潜力。我们见过太多死于“PPT造车”或“实验室自嗨”的项目。

从场景成熟度的角度看,蔡磊的“破冰”行动真正厉害的地方,不只是“相信”,而是把相信之后的每一步,把一个原本高度破碎、长期低效、缺乏足够资源关注的罕见病场景,逐步组织成了一个患者、数据、样本、科研、临床、资金、AI 与公众信任共同参与的协同系统。

1. 数据和工作流:从零散病友到研发基础设施

罕见病研发最大的难题之一,是患者分散、样本稀缺、真实世界数据不足。很多时候,科研并不是没有方向,而是缺少足够稳定、持续、可用的数据基础。

蔡磊牵头搭建的“渐愈互助之家”,是全球最大的民间渐冻症科研数据库(注册量突破18000人),收录了上万份结构化的真实世界病例。

数据和工作流:从零散病友到研发基础设施 Mans International
  • 在工作流端:这套360度动态生命指标跟踪系统,将原本极其低效的临床招募压缩到了令人惊叹的速度——实现以“小时”为单位的极速响应(2小时700人报名,3个月内开启临床)。
  • 在数据端:他启动了“渐冻症科研AI大脑”,全天候训练全网超2000万篇跨学科文献。AI 没有增加研究员的负担,而是“消失”在科研工作中,自动过滤与进化靶点。

2. 商业闭环:使命必须有长期供血机制

罕见病科研很难完全依赖短期捐赠或单点资助。药物研发周期长、失败率高、资金需求持续,而外部融资环境、公益热度和社会关注度都会波动。如果没有稳定的资金来源,再宏大的使命也很容易在中途失血。

蔡磊和段睿所形成的夫妻共患难组合,恰恰体现了愿景与运营的互补。很多人看到段睿的直播,会首先想到“妻子的牺牲”。这当然是真实的,也是令人动容的。但在商业视角下,这是极其高明的商业闭环设计。

蔡磊负责不断拉高使命天花板,连接患者、科学家、药企和社会关注;段睿则承担大量现实层面的运营压力,包括直播、团队、资金、成本、节奏和风险控制。这种“前端商业造血+后端科研烧钱”的闭环,为一个长周期、高不确定性的科研项目,提供了一种持续供血机制。

商业闭环:使命必须有长期供血机制 Mans International
商业闭环:使命必须有长期供血机制

3. 叙事:从悲情共情到产业行动共识

在蔡磊之前,渐冻症在公众与产业语境中,始终是 “无药可治、无利可图” 的悲情命题 —— 只有泛化的同情,没有明确的行动路径,属于典型的弱叙事场景。

蔡磊完成了叙事层面的本质升维:他没有停留在 “呼吁关注” 的情感表达,而是将罕见病研发拆解为可落地的产业命题,让科研界、产业界、公众都清晰看到自身的参与方式与价值。

这套成熟叙事最终穿透圈层,联动起全球 60 余个科研团队、50 余家生物科技公司,将 “无人敢碰的冷门赛道” 变成了有共识、有资源、有节奏的攻坚战场。

蔡磊在2026 年6月21日世界渐冻人日的《倒计时》演讲,更是进一步强化了全行业的攻坚共识,成为推动场景持续进化的精神内核。

二、 天行健,君子以自强不息:给中国创始人的“心力”启示

蔡磊在最新的视频《倒计时》中说:“我已经终结了一个比他更可怕的对手,名为绝望。”

他把自己比作孙悟空,“纵使不敌,也绝不屈服”。对当下正穿越周期阵痛、直面生死考验的中国创始人而言,蔡磊的“心力”是一面镜子:

第一,摒弃受害者心态。

抱怨大环境、哀叹资本寒冬毫无价值。蔡磊全身瘫痪、彻底失语,从未沉湎于命运不公,而是立刻切换战略,以眼控仪开启 “生死时速”。接受现实,倾尽所能 —— 这是创始人最底层的职业素养。

第二,在绝境中撬开增量缝隙。

蔡磊说:“你觉得前方只有一堵墙,其实未必,低头看有路,侧身有缝,甚至你可以选择翻过去、挖过去。” 当传统融资收窄、出海壁垒高筑,创始人的核心能力,就是借助 AI 杠杆、跨界生态,撬开被主流忽略的增长空间。

在绝境中撬开增量缝隙 Mans International
在绝境中撬开增量缝隙

第三,把事业锚定在更大的命题上。

“战胜恐惧最好的方法,就是把自己置于一个更大的事业当中。” 当企业愿景与硬科技突围、生命科学攻坚、能源变革等社会核心命题绑定,你获得的韧性,将远超世俗名利的支撑。

华大集团 CEO 尹烨是蔡磊科研生态的核心产业合作者:“你说要‘打光最后一颗子弹’,但这颗子弹会形成撞击,产生裂变,唤起更多的社会群体参与进来,共同解决。”

蔡磊以第一性原理与极致执行力,搭建起全球成熟度领先的 ALS 科研与数据基建。而攻克神经退行性疾病,不止关乎 50 万 ALS 患者,更关乎未来数十亿面临阿尔茨海默、帕金森威胁的全人类,这需要一支全球舰队的协同。

结语:倒计时,是胜利的序曲

蔡磊的房间里摆着四个时钟,滴答作响。

媒体说,那是他生命的倒计时。

他却说:“这是我送给渐冻症的倒计时。”

“如果眼睛看不见了,我会连上脑机接口;万一脑子转不动了,就把意识传送到具身机器人。我一路走到绝症面前,不是来向它投降的。”

天行健,君子以自强不息。

敬所有在周期谷底仍步履不停的创始人,敬所有在实验室死磕的科研人,敬所有不屈服于命运的前行者。

不必追问希望在何处 —— 向前走,希望自会显现。只要不退却,四面八方,皆是前路。

全球顶尖科研机构、跨国药企、Biotech 及国际基金:若您希望直通全球最大渐冻症科研生态与极速临床转化通道,请通过 Mans International 对接。我们以 SMAF 框架为您精准匹配患者数据、生物样本与临床招募资源,打通跨境跨界协同壁垒,加速您的管线从实验室走向临床。

英矽智能与“AI 制药溢价”:一场 SMAF 压力测试

英矽智能与“AI 制药溢价”:一场 SMAF 压力测试 萃有集

2023年,我曾在书中首次深度剖析英矽智能(Insilico Medicine)。当时,它凭借将AI发现的候选药物推进至FDA临床一期,成为 AI 驱动药物研发领域最耀眼的先锋。

到了2025年,英矽智能的叙事已超越了单纯的“研发速度”。它成为了一个行业试金石:AI 能否通过 PreciousGPT 平台和核心资产 Rentosertib(ISM001-055),将生物学洞察真正转化为在长寿和衰老相关疾病领域,具备临床意义与商业可行性的资产。

英矽智能与“AI 制药溢价”:一场 SMAF 压力测试 Mans International
英矽智能与“AI 制药溢价”:一场 SMAF 压力测试

而到了 2026 年,故事变得更为复杂。

尽管英矽智能与礼来(Eli Lilly)达成了最高可达27.5亿美元(含1.15亿美元首付款)的里程碑式合作,但在2025年录得 3.523 亿美元净亏损及港股剧烈波动的背景下,其资本市场叙事仍承受着巨大压力。

这正是我将其选为 SMAF Sprint 2026 案例的原因。

核心启示在于: 在 AI 商业化进程中,技术成熟度、数据成熟度、商业成熟度与叙事成熟度,往往无法同步达成。这种“多维错配”,正是场景成熟度评估框架(SMAF, Scenario Maturity Assessment Framework) 旨在精准诊断的核心命题。

SMAF 框架下的核心错配:AI 技术迭代速度,远超资本市场信任建立速度

1、业务与叙事成熟度:“AI 发现新药”已无法支撑估值溢价

英矽智能真正的突破,不在于“使用了AI”,而在于将宽泛的技术愿景落地为具体的商业场景。

在长寿生物科技领域,“衰老”并非 FDA 认可的适应症。企业必须从抽象的“延长健康寿命”愿景,转向具有明确监管逻辑和可量化终点的特定疾病。英矽智能通过瞄准特发性肺纤维化(IPF),成功实现了这一跨越。

从 SMAF 视角来看,这至关重要。公司没有停留在“AI 能发现药物”的口号层面,而是选择了一个能让技术在真实世界的商业、监管、合作与临床证据要求下接受检验的疾病场景。

这就是其核心资产 Rentosertib 的意义所在。它将讨论从“AI 发现”提升到了一个更严峻的问题:“AI赋能的生物科技公司,能否将发现转化为经过验证的资产、战略合作以及可复制的商业价值?”

业务与叙事成熟度:“AI 发现新药”已无法支撑估值溢价 Mans International
业务与叙事成熟度:“AI 发现新药”已无法支撑估值溢价

在 AI 浪潮早期,“AI 发现药物”是一个有力且简单的故事。但到了 2026 年,市场需要细节。投资者追问的是:具体靶点是什么?临床终点在哪?监管路径如何?合作伙伴是谁?资产能否规模化复制?

成熟的叙事从不夸大确定性,而是清晰地描绘从“技术可能性”到“商业现实”的路径。

对创始人的启示: 市场初期或许会为 AI 的新颖性买单,但长期来看,市场只奖励经过验证的资产、可信的商业路径,以及能将技术与价值创造紧密相连的叙事。

2、跨境运营成熟度:研发效率≠全球商业信任

英矽智能是典型的东西方双轨运营 AI 药企:研发中心扎根中国香港、内地生物医药产业集群,深度依托国内完备的生物医药自动化供应链、低成本临床试验资源、海量生物组学数据以及高端算法工程师人才池。依托亚洲产业链优势,它的管线研发速度、成本控制能力远超欧美本土AI药企。

但研发提速,不等于全球商业化成功。跨境 AI 药企需要补齐一套完全独立于研发之外的能力:跨区域监管沟通、全球临床数据透明化披露、跨国药企内部尽调信任、跨境数据合规治理、地缘风险对冲。

这也是当前中资背景出海 AI 药企的隐性短板:国内团队擅长高效率产出研发数据,但不擅长向欧美药监、跨国药企、海外二级市场投资人解释数据逻辑、合规细节。研发跑得快,却无法获得全球利益相关方的信任,最终导致管线授权、海外上市估值受阻。

跨境运营成熟度:研发效率≠全球商业信任 Mans International
跨境运营成熟度:研发效率≠全球商业信任

结合 SMAF 框架拆解四大跨境成熟度考核标准,也是投资人尽调核心要点:

  1. 商业模式能否适配跨国药企联合研发、全球分销的合作规则;
  2. 临床原始数据、算法溯源记录能否通过欧美第三方合规审查;
  3. AI 研发全流程能否满足跨国药企最高等级商业尽调要求;
  4. 中英文双版本叙事能否消除文化、监管认知偏差。

所有跨境生物医药创始人都要回答一个底层问题:你的企业能否做到全球语境下的可理解、可核查、可信任,而非仅适配中国本土资本与产业逻辑。

3. AI 药企估值溢价并未消失,只是进入按需定价阶段

通过 SMAF 框架审视,“AI 制药溢价”不再是理所当然的。它已成为一种 “条件性溢价”,必须通过临床推进、可复制的资产、大药企验证、资本纪律以及全球认可的治理结构来赢取。

英矽智能当下的股价波动、业绩亏损,本质就是全球资本市场对AI生物医药赛道的一次实景压力测试。

溢价的获取程度,正比于这五个主要条件的满足程度:

  1. 管线临床数据持续达标、
  2. 多管线可复制研发成果、
  3. 获得头部跨国药企商业化背书、
  4. 严格管控现金流与资本开支、
  5. 搭建全球统一的数据合规治理体系。
AI 药企估值溢价并未消失,只是进入按需定价阶段 Mans International
AI 药企估值溢价并未消失,只是进入按需定价阶段

针对跨境生物医药创始人、一二级市场投资人、产业战略决策者,最终落地启示:突破性技术只是敲门砖,唯有“场景成熟度”才能让门保持敞开。对于东西方跨境药企而言,跨境资本通道不只是简单打通海内外融资、上市渠道,更要完成三层转化:

  1. 把亚洲研发速度转化为全球信任、
  2. 把实验室科研数据转化为合规临床证据、
  3. 把平台型技术愿景转化为全球统一认可的商业价值。


这正是我们在 SMAF Sprint 2026 中所执行的核心诊断。我们运用“场景成熟度评估框架(SMAF)”,协助创始人、投资者与战略决策者厘清一个核心命题:

如果技术本身是成立的,其周边的商业场景是否足够成熟,足以将其转化为真正的市场采用、营收增长与持久的战略价值?